Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

    m (formatting)
    (revise tikiwiki -JD)
    Line 48: Line 48:
    </tr>
    </tr>
    <td>
    <td>
    *Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers at all - form for describing [[wiki feature request]] incomprehensible even to a [[usability guru]]
    *Feature rich (e.g. forums, picture gallery, blog, maps, email newsletter)
    *Comment forum on every page
    *Granular user group permissions
    *PHP based
    *PHP based
    *meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[RDF]]
    *Uses different [[wikisyntax]] then Wikipedia
    *Meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[RDF]]
    *Relies on [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]]
    *Relies on [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]]
    *email/forums (and integration) built-in
    *email/forums (and integration) built-in
    Line 57: Line 60:
    *Visualization of wiki-links
    *Visualization of wiki-links
    *Polls built in
    *Polls built in
    *Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
    *Highly active development
    *supports Postgres, Oracle, Sybase and [[SQLite]] (built in PHP 5.0!) databases not just MySQL - strategic to integrate with some [[essential projects]]
    *Large developer community with scattered documentation and communition forums
    *Supports Postgres, Oracle, Sybase and [[SQLite]] (built in PHP 5.0!) databases not just MySQL - strategic to integrate with some [[essential projects]]
    *developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
    *developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
    </td>
    </td>