|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| Every person gets two votes on each issue: | | Every person gets two votes on each issue: |
|
| |
|
| *An indirect vote. This vote cannot be used directly, but can be assigned to an '''registered''' not-for-profit organsation, including potentially a [[political party]], that uses the voting power as decided by the governance of the organisation, thus rendering the identity of the vote holder anonymous. For verification purposes it might be a reasonable requirement that you must be a member of, or a donor to, the organisation that you give your voting power to. You may give your vote to only one organisation at a time. You may transfer it to an another organisation or just revoke it. The Burden of proof on the right to use a vote is mostly on the organisation in question. | | *An [[Indirect Vote]]. |
| | | *A [[Direct Vote]]. |
| *A direct vote. This is perhaps a little unfair since people who don't have access to computer systems are likely unable to use their direct vote. Burden of proof on authentication is yet to be solved. A partial solution could be to divide the direct votes into three distinct groups and let the consumers decide on the amount of trust they place on each group of voters: | |
| | |
| #Voters authenticated with cryptographic methods, where the identity of the keyholder is known by an commercial or non-commercial certification authority.
| |
| #Voters authenticated by an email address issued by an institutional issuer such as an university, school, company or a governmental organisation ie. where it is publicly known that the postmaster checks the identities of people before issuing an email address
| |
| #The rest ie. anonymous email services
| |
|
| |
|
| Where issue is a disputed article or a [[campaign]]. | | Where issue is a disputed article or a [[campaign]]. |