Campaigns: Difference between revisions
m (endorsment -> endorsement) |
m (endorsment -> endorsement) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#Subscribing to a campaign gives a person one vote when meeting is called to make decisions ([[split]], [[merge]]r, [[opinion change]], [[nullify]]ing) about the campaign | #Subscribing to a campaign gives a person one vote when meeting is called to make decisions ([[split]], [[merge]]r, [[opinion change]], [[nullify]]ing) about the campaign | ||
#Campaigns can be [[merge]]d and [[split]] just like traditional incorporated bodies. | #Campaigns can be [[merge]]d and [[split]] just like traditional incorporated bodies. | ||
#Campaigns set a [[score]] for themselves. This is basically just an number. Positive means it's an [[ | #Campaigns set a [[score]] for themselves. This is basically just an number. Positive means it's an [[endorsement]] and negative means its a [[boycott]]. | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 00:38, 2 June 2003
Campaigns are an essential feature.
Campaigns can be calls for boycott or endorsement. They can be targeted at individual products product groups, brands, companies, corporations, supply chains or areas. Areas can be provinces or countries.
Some preliminary ideas:
- Anyone can start a campaign on anything, thus becoming a Campaigner
- You may subscribe only to one of the campaigns targeted at the same thing
- Campaigners can be virtual or real entities (cybercampaigns and realworld campaigns should be treated a little differently, real have more "weight" then virtual)
- Subscribing to a campaign gives a person one vote when meeting is called to make decisions (split, merger, opinion change, nullifying) about the campaign
- Campaigns can be merged and split just like traditional incorporated bodies.
- Campaigns set a score for themselves. This is basically just an number. Positive means it's an endorsement and negative means its a boycott.
See also:
- Feedback to the producer can be used to enhance the power of a campaign
- Life exchange this article is radical and uses the word "profit" inappropriatelly, but it's thought provoking