Glossary: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (first try at Consumeriumspeak)
     
    (everything required to understand money I think)
    Line 8: Line 8:
    The preliminary list of terms to ensure are defined correctly and compatibly in all languages, without all of which Consumerium makes no sense or can't work:
    The preliminary list of terms to ensure are defined correctly and compatibly in all languages, without all of which Consumerium makes no sense or can't work:


    *[[account]] as in accounting, accountability, [[unit of account]]
    *[[bad]] not evil
    *[[bad]] not evil
    *[[biosphere]] includes terrestrial ecoregions, oceans, atmosphere, is a big body
    *[[biosphere]] includes terrestrial ecoregions, oceans, atmosphere, is a big body
    *[[body]]
    *[[body]]
    *[[buy]] can have moral criteria, one can do evil by buying
    *[[buy]] can have moral criteria, one can do evil by buying, some implied by simply choosing a certain [[medium of exchange]], e.g. [[US dollar]], [[gold]].
    *[[care]]
    *[[commodity]] as services - a good backed by standard contracts, trade empire
    *[[commodity]] as services - a good backed by standard contracts, trade empire
    *[[cost]] only calculable through risk, until you know what is done
    *[[cost]] only calculable through risk, until you know what is done
    *[[dignity]] implies care
    *[[done]] as legal concept
    *[[done]] as legal concept
    *[[ecology]] of Earth  
    *[[ecology]] of Earth  
    *[[ecoregion]]
    *[[ecoregion]]
    *[[ethic]], singular, how you balance [[rights]] to avoid or reduce [[evil]]
    *[[evil]]
    *[[evil]]
    *[[faction]] agrees what person, safe, fair, done, evil, forgive and ignore mean.
    *[[fact]] is disprovable
    *[[faction]] agrees what person, safe, fair, done, evil, forgive and ignore mean - social group with one ethic, maybe sharing an approach to negotiating it th other groups in a [[society]]?
    *[[fair]] as ecologically founded but socially negotiated
    *[[fair]] as ecologically founded but socially negotiated
    *[[forgive]]
    *[[forgive]]
    *[[forgiveness]] as measurable
    *[[forgiveness]] as measurable
    *[[freedom]] implies health
    *[[gain]]
    *[[good]] as services - a product backed by social custom, legal guarantees
    *[[good]] as services - a product backed by social custom, legal guarantees
    *[[ignorance]]
    *[[ignorance]]
    Line 27: Line 34:
    *[[illth]] is opposite of wealth
    *[[illth]] is opposite of wealth
    *[[instructional]] responsibility - you tell 'em how, it's your fault
    *[[instructional]] responsibility - you tell 'em how, it's your fault
    *[[interest]] in the sense of concern or group sharing it, economic [[gain]], and expected [[time cost of money]] for [[standard of deferred payment]]
    *[[justice]] as broader than [[w:retributive justice]], e.g. [[w:social justice]] and other types of [[w:criminal justice]] might be meant by it
    *[[measure]]
    *[[measure]]
    *[[money]] defined correctly and completely as something that is all of:
    **[[unit of account]]
    **[[store of value]]
    **[[medium of exchange]]
    **[[standard of deferred payment]]
    *[[person]] is not always human:  could be ape, corporation.  legal concept
    *[[person]] is not always human:  could be ape, corporation.  legal concept
    *[[regret]] measurable
    *[[regret]] measurable
    *[[resource]] includes waste
    *[[resource]] includes waste
    *[[risk]] only basis of cost
    *[[risk]] only basis of cost, defined as regret in the future looking back?
    *[[service]] includes things states do, e.g. regulate markets, tax, set standards
    *[[service]] includes things states do, e.g. regulate markets, tax, set standards
    *[[power]] in energy, social, instructional/knowledge/skill, buying sense
    *[[power]] in energy, social, instructional/knowledge/skill, buying sense
    *[[safe]] as social not objective idea except via ecology to a degree
    *[[safe]] as social not objective idea except via ecology to a degree
    *[[sell]] can have moral conditions
    *[[save]] as rescue, as "savings", i.e. [[store of value]] e.g. as [[money]]
    *[[social]] trust
    *[[sell]] can have moral conditions, some implied by [[medium of exchange]]
    *[[social]] trust, e.g. as quantified by [[social capital]]
    *[[threat]] - not tangible, yet anyway, not a [[risk]]
    *[[trust]]
    *[[truth]] - see examples [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=truth of definitions of scope of truth] and see if [[Consumerium]] takes one position and if so how can it be defined in a dictionary generally
    *[[waste]] as resource
    *[[waste]] as resource
    *[[wealth]] as well-being
    *[[wealth]] as at least mentioning freedom, well-being, health, illth
    *[[well]] as root of "wealth"
    *[[well-being]]
    *[[well-being]]


    ''Discussion of these is in [[Talk:urban ecology]] - discuss in [[Talk:glossary]]''
    ''First discussion of these was in [[Talk:urban ecology]] - discuss in [[Talk:glossary]] from now on.  ''

    Revision as of 05:38, 5 May 2003

    The Consumerium glossary is those terms which must be understood or broadened or narrowed in the Wiktionary to enable Consumerium's mission. In general this requires three types of terminology shift:

    • adding terms that the general public does not yet know, e.g. ecoregion
    • narrowing terms that are usually understood too locally, e.g. "safe"
    • broadening terms that have many different ways to define, e.g. "fair"

    In addition it might be necessary to simply fix definitions of terms that are wrong, e.g. "done" or "person", most people simply do not understand that legal and moral definitions of these can vary widely and drastically.

    The preliminary list of terms to ensure are defined correctly and compatibly in all languages, without all of which Consumerium makes no sense or can't work:

    First discussion of these was in Talk:urban ecology - discuss in Talk:glossary from now on.