Talk:Wiki witchhunt: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(the hunt begins) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | ||
:Woops censored by [[sysop vandalism]] via [[denial of service attack]] via [[vandalbot]] via Tim... ooh let's not go there. | |||
------------- | |||
Seems it ''is'' happening here, with emergence of articles like [[Craig Hubley]]. How should [[Consumerium:We|we]] respond? | |||
Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]? If so what good is it? | |||
Revision as of 00:49, 8 September 2004
Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.'
- There is extremely strong circumstantial evidence that Wikimedia and MediaWiki promoters were directly involved in vandalbot attacks just before the final denial of service attack. It is not clear whether this is what discouraged Recyclopedia's founder from continuing, but it seems likely. This is far more valid than a "conspiracy theory".
If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist Recyclopedia studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt
- Woops censored by sysop vandalism via denial of service attack via vandalbot via Tim... ooh let's not go there.
Seems it is happening here, with emergence of articles like Craig Hubley. How should we respond?
Is it really the case that someone can write lies about Craig Hubley but they cannot tell the truth about Gus Kouwenhoven, at Consumerium? If so what good is it?