Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions
(doesn't this belong in an encyclopedia or something?) |
(implications for trolls) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This seems like a long-winded and general way of saying what is already said at [[ontological distinction]] anyway. This long version belongs in [[Wikipedia]] or [[Wikinfo]] not here probably. | This seems like a long-winded and general way of saying what is already said at [[ontological distinction]] anyway. This long version belongs in [[Wikipedia]] or [[Wikinfo]] not here probably. | ||
The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]? God's cognition implies all beings? | |||
By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s. | |||
Revision as of 18:38, 4 July 2004
This seems like a long-winded and general way of saying what is already said at ontological distinction anyway. This long version belongs in Wikipedia or Wikinfo not here probably.
The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition implies being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this God's Eye View? God's cognition implies all beings?
By contrast the GodKing's view, or community point of view, implies only trolls, hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly usurpers.