Talk:Consumerium Process: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:02, 12 March 2004

THIS PAGE IS FOR DISCUSSING THE CONSUMERIUM PROCESS. USE THIS PAGE AS A FOCUS POINT FOR FIGURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCESSES ENABLING Consumerium Services and Features

This is just as I imagined it would work since you introduced "proper" descriptions and distinguishation between Signal Wiki and Research Wiki. I agree we should go on using these terms and adopt the stuff from Opinion Wiki and Content Wiki to these articles.

I suggest that Campaigns and TCE functionality should go to the Signal Wiki for the Campaign-functionality is briefly described as facts about somebody expressing an opinion about something or facts about someones support for some opinion

Now the strict multilevel security measures described in Opinion Wiki will have to be played down to make Signal Wiki operation more feasible. --Juxo 22:13, 11 Mar 2004 (EET)

Also we should rethink everything about Signal Wiki to accomodate the concerns User:DanKeshet raised. The idea of printing a book is a good one, and it's now dealt with in Consumerium buying signal directly. It is lower tech than the audio stuff even. And it would certainly serve for instance purposes like the Big Carrot's, they could print the book and go through to figure out if they really had to stock a product, or if they could ditch it and there was sufficient competing substitutes (something a human has to figure out). Remember, getting the crap off the retail shelf entirely has the biggest impact! Anyone willing to be friendly retail might also be quite willing to vet their products this way!

Revision as of 20:13, 11 March 2004 (edit) Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) (agreed. the signal/research scheme is more intuitive) ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:02, 12 March 2004 (edit) (undo) 142.177.93.81 (talk) (dealing with Dan's concerns) Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Now the strict multilevel security measures described in [[Opinion Wiki]] will have to be played down to make [[Signal Wiki]] operation more feasible. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 22:13, 11 Mar 2004 (EET)		Now the strict multilevel security measures described in [[Opinion Wiki]] will have to be played down to make [[Signal Wiki]] operation more feasible. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 22:13, 11 Mar 2004 (EET)

			:Also we should rethink everything about [[Signal Wiki]] to accomodate the concerns [[User:DanKeshet]] raised. The idea of printing a book is a good one, and it's now dealt with in [[Consumerium buying signal]] directly. It is lower tech than the [[audio]] stuff even. And it would certainly serve for instance purposes like the [[Big Carrot]]'s, they could print the book and go through to figure out if they really had to stock a product, or if they could ditch it and there was sufficient competing substitutes (something a human has to figure out). Remember, getting the crap off the [[retail shelf]] entirely has the biggest impact! Anyone willing to be [[friendly retail]] might also be quite willing to vet their products this way!