Trust: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    No edit summary
    Line 2: Line 2:


    [[Troll]]s tend to challenge prevailing ideas about trust - on [[large public wiki]]s they very often succeed in reversing people's beliefs about reputation and trustworthiness, by using a sort of [[scientific method]] of baiting [[sysop]]s.  This works quite reliably and may bring about [[regime change]].
    [[Troll]]s tend to challenge prevailing ideas about trust - on [[large public wiki]]s they very often succeed in reversing people's beliefs about reputation and trustworthiness, by using a sort of [[scientific method]] of baiting [[sysop]]s.  This works quite reliably and may bring about [[regime change]].
    In response to 18th century trolls, who created the French Revolution and American Revolution, [[governance organization]]s began to use [[distrust]] more explicitly, to prevent trust from becoming too centralized.  This is probably what the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] should do on day one, instead of repeating all of political evolution as [[Wikipedia]] is doomed to do, wasting years trying to deny that [[politics as usual]] is also inevitable and that [[factionalism]] is probably good too, when it's correctly supported and each element of the [[political spectrum]] has their own role & [[faction]] to protect [[common interests]].


    A [[legal trust]] like a [[patent pool]] is a different question entirely.
    A [[legal trust]] like a [[patent pool]] is a different question entirely.


    See [[w:trust]] for a more general discussion of both ideas of trust.
    See [[w:trust]] for a more general discussion of both ideas of trust.

    Revision as of 19:23, 25 November 2003

    Trust for our purposes can be divided into found trust, built trust and grown trust. It can be measured as "social capital" but not very reliably, as usually a faction gets involved in what behaviour is seen as admirable or reliable or even predictable, and is certainly required to create reputation.

    Trolls tend to challenge prevailing ideas about trust - on large public wikis they very often succeed in reversing people's beliefs about reputation and trustworthiness, by using a sort of scientific method of baiting sysops. This works quite reliably and may bring about regime change.

    In response to 18th century trolls, who created the French Revolution and American Revolution, governance organizations began to use distrust more explicitly, to prevent trust from becoming too centralized. This is probably what the Consumerium Governance Organization should do on day one, instead of repeating all of political evolution as Wikipedia is doomed to do, wasting years trying to deny that politics as usual is also inevitable and that factionalism is probably good too, when it's correctly supported and each element of the political spectrum has their own role & faction to protect common interests.

    A legal trust like a patent pool is a different question entirely.

    See w:trust for a more general discussion of both ideas of trust.