Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

    (rm politics)
    (note about false claims on both "sides")
    Line 4: Line 4:
    *"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000384.html in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China], which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the [[GodKing]] unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on [[usual happy NPOV talk]]."  This was less than one day after the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
    *"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000384.html in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China], which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the [[GodKing]] unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on [[usual happy NPOV talk]]."  This was less than one day after the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
    *false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
    *false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
    ::Note that most false claims here have been made by [[142.177.X.X]] who seems to be on a personal vendetta on Wikipedia for banning him for persistent non-encyclopedic edits in the past
    *[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
    *[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
    *users not consulted when user environment changes
    *users not consulted when user environment changes