Opinion Wiki: Difference between revisions

    (Linking to troll-ed-ness-ed version of this article)
    (it is a large public wiki with many problems including naming it properly)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    '''Please see the [http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Opinion_Wiki&diff=0&oldid=1495 The Diff from the last version] or [http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Opinion_Wiki&oldid=1495 The original article] for a clear view on this before it got hit by horde(s) of [[trolls]]
    '''Please see the [http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Opinion_Wiki&diff=0&oldid=1495 The Diff from the last version] or [http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Opinion_Wiki&oldid=1495 The original article] for a clear view on this before it got hit by horde(s) of [[trolls]].''


    ==Background==
    ==Background==
    [[The Consumerium Exchange]], some complain, is a misleading name for the facility, which is about '''experessing opinions and support or the lack of for the expressed opinions'''.  It does not translate well at all - hence the new working title and design approach.  We now call it the '''opinion wiki'''.
     
    [[The Consumerium Exchange]], some complain, is a misleading name for this facility, which is about '''expressing opinions and support or the lack of for the expressed opinions'''.  It does not translate well at all - hence the new working title and design approach.  We now call it the '''opinion wiki'''.
     
    It will be a [[large public wiki]] with the special problems of that type of communication.  Including choosing a good name.


    As mentioned in [[Campaign#Campaign Management|Campaign]], campaign management may be best organized by wiki.  This would be simple and straightforward for the campaigners.  It would require only a low-end browser to contribute to the [[semantic web of views]].  No fixed email address would be required.  Many client software variations might work.
    As mentioned in [[Campaign#Campaign Management|Campaign]], campaign management may be best organized by wiki.  This would be simple and straightforward for the campaigners.  It would require only a low-end browser to contribute to the [[semantic web of views]].  No fixed email address would be required.  Many client software variations might work.