Talk:142.177.X.X: Difference between revisions
(real cases please - starting with CIV) |
(a message to our troll leader) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:How about undeleting [[CIV]] so that some serious people who should be seriously boycotted can be boycotted? That is the only way to attract those here to collaborate who actually care about the issues - they aren't going to help with the abstract stuff unless they care about the specific stuff. Without a few dozen reports of bad behaviour by corporations, we can't see what is in common about them, what the different metrics are we need to capture, how different reporting groups treat them. Thus we can't do anything - we need CASES of ACTUAL COMPANIES that would get a "red light". | :How about undeleting [[CIV]] so that some serious people who should be seriously boycotted can be boycotted? That is the only way to attract those here to collaborate who actually care about the issues - they aren't going to help with the abstract stuff unless they care about the specific stuff. Without a few dozen reports of bad behaviour by corporations, we can't see what is in common about them, what the different metrics are we need to capture, how different reporting groups treat them. Thus we can't do anything - we need CASES of ACTUAL COMPANIES that would get a "red light". | ||
---- | |||
I still see a gazillion of reasons why betting (with real money) in any form is not applicable for achieving our goal of finally one day implementating some of [[Consumerium:Itself|the things we've dreamed up]]. | |||
It's got security issues, legal issues, administrative issues, image issues and it's unegalitarian. These are off-handedly my main points why it's not a good idea. | |||
Care to explain here how it _could_ work in practice??? | |||
And why, why oh why did you have to troll the [[Opinion Wiki]] just now when i have really pressing non-consumerium issues i have to attend to? [[Talk:Opinion Wiki]] was good stuff, thanks for it. | |||