Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (rm useless guessing)
     
    (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    142, please provide specifics and references for these claims.
    #REDIRECT [[Talk:alleged Wikimedia corruption]]
     
    :Doing so for new claims;  However, since lies, [[libel]] and [[echo chamber]] fraud are freely spread on [[vile mailing list]]s run by [[Wikimedia]] without any such specifics or references, it might be abusive to require such documentation from their opponents;  most specific references are in the sub-articles using the most infamous [[Wikimedia]] clowns as the universal bad example for how not to do [[wiki governance]].
     
    :Is [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000365.html being blocked in China] evidence of corruption?  hm.  [[Trolls]] would say no, but, [[sysop power structure]] would have to respect China's [[power structure]] and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|hail to the red faction]]!
     
    ----
     
    The partially released [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000370.html results] of the [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] "election" proves what [[trolls]] have always said:  it is a front for the [[sysop power structure]]:
     
    "The top 3 for contributing rep were:
     
    Anthere  269
    Eloquence 258  ([[Erik Moeller]])
    Maveric149 163  (([[Daniel Mayer]])
     
    The top 2 for for volunteer rep:
     
    Angela  345  ([[Auntie Angela]])
    Maveric149 159"  ([[Daniel Mayer]])

    Latest revision as of 20:33, 19 August 2004