E-waste: Difference between revisions

good references - this has just leaped up to being THE major concern in design, since ONE CHIP DOES MORE HARM THAN A CAR apparently
m Reverted edits by 46.161.41.32 (talk) to last revision by Juboxi
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
References:
References:


*[http://www.esheep.org/sthttp://cbc.ca/stories/2002/11/06/microchip021106 CBC News story], "it takes at least 1.6 kilograms of fossil fuels and chemical inputs to produce a single two-gram memory chip for personal computers."  
*[http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/11/06/microchip021106 CBC News story], "it takes at least 1.6 kilograms of fossil fuels and chemical inputs to produce a single two-gram memory chip for personal computers."  
*[http://www.esheep.org/story/EpFZEVlAuZhGdjRkIR.shtml UNU study], "weight for weight, the average computer chip does more harm to the environment than the car."  
*[http://www.esheep.org/story/EpFZEVlAuZhGdjRkIR.shtml UNU study], "weight for weight, the average computer chip does more harm to the environment than the car."  
*[http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_8/critical/ a social ecology of wireless communication]
*[http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_8/critical/ a social ecology of wireless communication]