Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (linking) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is no one agreed perspective on '''Wikipedia''' [http://www.wikipedia.org/ (.org)] and its role in [[Consumerium Services]]. It is an extremely controversial project and so any relation to it is controversial. For now, [[w:]] links to background articles in [[Develop Wiki]] redirect to '''Wikipedia''' as a source of [[enemy project]] perspectives: views of reality from a far-right or fascist point of view i.e. that of "[[Wikimedia]]", "[[America]]" or the [[EPOV]], based on [[might makes right]] and [[technological escalation]] against any objectors. | |||
* | |||
* | Because of this controversy, it is proposed that [[Research Wiki]] background articles default to [[Wikinfo]] instead. Its [[sympathetic point of view]] is much less amenable to [[usurper]] activity than the [[neutral point of view]]: | ||
See | |||
*[[Wikipedia (neutral)]] - a more balanced view of the project than [[w:Wikipedia]] which is self-promotional | |||
*[[Wikipedia (Reds)]] - a critical perspective from those seeking to [[end Wikimedia]], and some contributions that were formative in that perspective: | |||
::[[Wikipedia (Richard Chilton)]] | |||
::[[Wikipedia (142 trolls)]] | |||
::[[Wikipedia Red Faction]] | |||
'''External links:''' | |||
*http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Anti-rules | |||
Latest revision as of 14:10, 12 January 2013
There is no one agreed perspective on Wikipedia (.org) and its role in Consumerium Services. It is an extremely controversial project and so any relation to it is controversial. For now, w: links to background articles in Develop Wiki redirect to Wikipedia as a source of enemy project perspectives: views of reality from a far-right or fascist point of view i.e. that of "Wikimedia", "America" or the EPOV, based on might makes right and technological escalation against any objectors.
Because of this controversy, it is proposed that Research Wiki background articles default to Wikinfo instead. Its sympathetic point of view is much less amenable to usurper activity than the neutral point of view:
See
- Wikipedia (neutral) - a more balanced view of the project than w:Wikipedia which is self-promotional
- Wikipedia (Reds) - a critical perspective from those seeking to end Wikimedia, and some contributions that were formative in that perspective:
External links: