Talk:Ad hominem delete: Difference between revisions
(Care to "Ad hominem" in simple or ordinary English?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ad hominem? Care to explain this in simple or ordinary English? Not all of us are latin readers --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:45, 2 Feb 2004 (EET) | Ad hominem? Care to explain this in simple or ordinary English? Not all of us are latin readers --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:45, 2 Feb 2004 (EET) | ||
:"ad hominem" is a Latin phrase used very commonly in English (just like "ad nauseum", and also "i.e." and "e.g." are abbreviations of Latin phrases). It is, effectively, part of English. | |||
:What it means is, in the context of an argument, referring to who made the argument, as opposed to the argument's own referents, in deciding whether to accept or reject it. It is normally considered proof that one has no real argument to offer against what is said, if one must invoke "who wrote it" as an refutation. | |||
Revision as of 22:26, 4 February 2004
Ad hominem? Care to explain this in simple or ordinary English? Not all of us are latin readers --Juxo 19:45, 2 Feb 2004 (EET)
- "ad hominem" is a Latin phrase used very commonly in English (just like "ad nauseum", and also "i.e." and "e.g." are abbreviations of Latin phrases). It is, effectively, part of English.
- What it means is, in the context of an argument, referring to who made the argument, as opposed to the argument's own referents, in deciding whether to accept or reject it. It is normally considered proof that one has no real argument to offer against what is said, if one must invoke "who wrote it" as an refutation.