New troll: Difference between revisions

from http://www.ouranswer.org/wiki/index.php/OurAnswer:Trolls/New_troll
undoing vandalism
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''new troll''' is a user who has gotten into one or more conflicts but is not clearly associated with any [[faction]] yet, or has deliberately denied being representative of any faction.  Basically, it's just someone who has been called a "[[troll]]" or otherwise told their point of view is idiosyncratic or invalid, and who has not yet developed any steady allies or collaborators here.
A '''new troll''' is a user who has gotten into one or more conflicts but is not clearly associated with any [[faction]] yet, or has deliberately denied being representative of any faction.  Basically, it's just someone who has been called a "[[troll]]" or otherwise told their point of view is idiosyncratic or invalid, and who has not yet developed any steady allies or collaborators here.


According mostly to [[trolls]], the [[New Troll point of view]] is a real and coherent thing that can be established by [[consensus]] and keep [[large public wiki]]s from freezing into simple cliques of the existing participants.  In this [[faction]]al view, the treatment of '''new troll'''s is central to all [[wiki governance]]. This view is strongly opposed to any imposition of [[community point of view]] or trusting any [[neutral point of view]] that the established "community" agrees with.
According mostly to [[trolls]], the [[New Troll point of view]] is a real and coherent thing that can be established by [[consensus]] and keep [[large public wiki]]s from freezing into simple cliques of the existing participants.  In this [[faction]]al view, the treatment of '''new troll'''s is central to all [[wiki governance]]. This view is strongly opposed to any imposition of [[community point of view]] or trusting any [[neutral point of view]] that the established "community" agrees with. But also there is the view that new trolls are pests and deserve no status or consideration, or that only those who [[use real names]] should get any help or only those who pay to keep things running should be able to edit any disputed article.


==Factional views==
==[[Faction]]al views==


===[[Trolls]]===
===[[Trolls]]===
Line 15: Line 15:
*Accordingly, [[Consumerium:We]] should be able to confidently say that no user arrives without being fully empowered and motivated to join some faction that they themselves find empowering;  If they reject the trolls' view, then, they can join some other faction.  But in no case are they left entirely alone vs. a [[sysop power structure]].
*Accordingly, [[Consumerium:We]] should be able to confidently say that no user arrives without being fully empowered and motivated to join some faction that they themselves find empowering;  If they reject the trolls' view, then, they can join some other faction.  But in no case are they left entirely alone vs. a [[sysop power structure]].


''Fair?  If not why not?  How else can [[democracy]] be organized?''
''Fair?  If not why not?  How else can [[democracy]] be organized? See also the theory of the [[open party]].''
 
== external links ==
 
*[http://yahoogroups.com/group/newtroll newtroll yahoo group]