Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,844
edits
142.177.X.X: Difference between revisions
142.177.X.X has a wiki, Lsb or http://let.sysops.be with evolving ontologies and fresh stuff
(restored last version) |
(142.177.X.X has a wiki, Lsb or http://let.sysops.be with evolving ontologies and fresh stuff) |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
142.177.X.X pretends to use "Mozilla/0.99 (Commodore 64; I; 1234K)"<br> | 142.177.X.X pretends to use "Mozilla/0.99 (Commodore 64; I; 1234K)"<br> | ||
142.177.X.X has sometimes opposite to the trollnature managed to write whole new articles that aren't misleading, incomprehensible and ultrademanding to fix for those trying to keep some sense to all of this, but actually informative and well written, such as [[Styles of capital]] <br> | 142.177.X.X has sometimes opposite to the trollnature managed to write whole new articles that aren't misleading, incomprehensible and ultrademanding to fix for those trying to keep some sense to all of this, but actually informative and well written, such as [[Styles of capital]] <br> | ||
142. | 142.177.X.X is a [[w:robot]]; it examines wiki history for controversy and pastes text into related articles. <br> | ||
142. | 142.177.X.X is a [[w:cult]]; it has beliefs, priests, rituals. <br> | ||
142.177.X.X is most famous for the amazing feat of succeding to write [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]] and | 142.177.X.X has a wiki, [[Lsb]] or http://let.sysops.be/wiki/ with evolving ontologies and fresh material around the year :D | ||
142.177.X.X is most famous for the amazing feat of succeding to write [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]] and kept it off [[w:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] for a looong time. '''Now the article has been deleted''' | |||
::That was obviously [[ad hominem delete]], i.e. [[sysop vandalism]]. The title was only the title you chose, because, you chose it. Certainly it was a worthy article and should be retained under a title like [[formal methods for ethical valuation]] which means the same thing. If an article stands for years and is only deleted when [[Tim Starling]] notices it referenced here, well... | |||
:Thank you. But the credit belongs only to my souped-up Commodore 64. It is a very wise machine. | :Thank you. But the credit belongs only to my souped-up Commodore 64. It is a very wise machine. | ||
::Nonsense. Machines cannot be wise, only intelligent. | |||
:But perhaps that article is simply *correct* and can thus be used to design the consumerium version of the method? | :But perhaps that article is simply *correct* and can thus be used to design the consumerium version of the method? | ||
| Line 22: | Line 28: | ||
:::Trolls agree. Cross linking is critical, so pick phrases carefully in titles. It is impossible to fix this later, if the phrases are wrong. | :::Trolls agree. Cross linking is critical, so pick phrases carefully in titles. It is impossible to fix this later, if the phrases are wrong. | ||
Legendary quote of 142.177.X.Xs' from [[Propaganda]]: | |||
"Propaganda is not what we do here." | |||
---- | |||
142.177.X.X often accuses other people of doing things or not doing things that he then proceeds to do or not do, respectively. For an example see http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:False_and_unsubstantiated_claims&curid=2818&diff=5266&oldid=5259 (about the complaint about the way that 142.177.X.X merged of Anthere's replies to his allegations with the allegations) and http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=False_or_unsubstantiated_claims_of_corruption&curid=2782&diff=5261&oldid=5260 (where he makes edits not mentioned in the summary and removes someone else's (mine) edits while adding his own elsewhere in the article) --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:52, 14 Sep 2004 (EEST) | |||