Trust model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:51, 9 March 2004 edit 142.177.92.162 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:24, 9 March 2004 edit undo Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators 9,923 edits m authoritative integrity -> authoritative identity integrity Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]]).		A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative identity integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]]).

	It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.		It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.