Talk:GetWiki: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(key GetWiki feature/required - redirecting name spaces?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This is a good reason to support a [[m:]] = "multiple", and [[n:]] = "neutral" and [[f:]] = "factional" name space. We select the best of each behind the scenes, rather than hardwiring assumptions about that into the article itself. Why not? We already point to [[w:]] articles which are ever-changing... so why not ever-changing redirects? | :This is a good reason to support a [[m:]] = "multiple", and [[n:]] = "neutral" and [[f:]] = "factional" name space. We select the best of each behind the scenes, rather than hardwiring assumptions about that into the article itself. Why not? We already point to [[w:]] articles which are ever-changing... so why not ever-changing redirects? | ||
::''We should copy and rewrite the articles in the [[Meta-Wikipedia]] space, as these are not in general relevant to [[Consumerium]] or even to [[mediawiki]]. Rewrites could help get some concepts clearer, and link them to the issues here.'' | |||
We certainly need to get [[GetWiki]] to run a test-wiki to see how it is different and maybe use [[Wikinfo]] or use [[Wikipedia]] as a user [[preference]]. | We certainly need to get [[GetWiki]] to run a test-wiki to see how it is different and maybe use [[Wikinfo]] or use [[Wikipedia]] as a user [[preference]]. | ||
:A good first step - the user could set where [[w:]] points for their purposes. Why not ask the GetWiki developers for this kind of feature? I'm sure they'll see the need for it. There should be arbitrary code possible to figure out where [[m:]], [[w:]], [[f:]], [[n:]] go. Maybe there already is? | :A good first step - the user could set where [[w:]] points for their purposes. Why not ask the GetWiki developers for this kind of feature? I'm sure they'll see the need for it. There should be arbitrary code possible to figure out where [[m:]], [[w:]], [[f:]], [[n:]] go. Maybe there already is? | ||