Talk:Simple model for expressing opinions: Difference between revisions
(a problem restriction in using whatlinkshere) |
m (typo) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is one problem. Currently the [[What links here]] function only provides the first 500 entries and it even doesn't tell if there are more articles linking. For [[vote]] counting and an SQL script can be used to circumvent this limitation, but it still poses a problem for this [[Simple model for expressing opinions]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:33, 23 Sep 2004 (EEST) | There is one problem. Currently the [[What links here]] function only provides the first 500 entries and it even doesn't tell if there are more articles linking. For [[vote]] counting and an SQL script can be used to circumvent this limitation, but it still poses a problem for this [[Simple model for expressing opinions]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:33, 23 Sep 2004 (EEST) | ||
See [[meta:Help:What_links_here|Meta on What | See [[meta:Help:What_links_here|Meta on What links here]] for more information on this. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
There is also a problem in placing [[Campaign]]s in [[Group]]-namespace. Consider that a joint virtual organisation is set up to drive the campaign furher it would require the campaign to be moved from the originating organisations space to the new organsations space. Now all the previous votes would still point to the previous location of the campaign. Maybe there is a way to get around this by using redirecting and/or special link tracking | |||
:This article needs to be fixed so that [[Campaign]]s are no longer in [[Group]] space but in [[Campaign]] space but there has to be explicitly stated which organization takes the responsibility for the campaign in question so that the staff knows to whom to forward the [[cease and desist letter]]s --18:10, 4 Nov 2004 (EET) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:10, 4 November 2004
There is one problem. Currently the What links here function only provides the first 500 entries and it even doesn't tell if there are more articles linking. For vote counting and an SQL script can be used to circumvent this limitation, but it still poses a problem for this Simple model for expressing opinions --Juxo 16:33, 23 Sep 2004 (EEST)
See Meta on What links here for more information on this.
There is also a problem in placing Campaigns in Group-namespace. Consider that a joint virtual organisation is set up to drive the campaign furher it would require the campaign to be moved from the originating organisations space to the new organsations space. Now all the previous votes would still point to the previous location of the campaign. Maybe there is a way to get around this by using redirecting and/or special link tracking
- This article needs to be fixed so that Campaigns are no longer in Group space but in Campaign space but there has to be explicitly stated which organization takes the responsibility for the campaign in question so that the staff knows to whom to forward the cease and desist letters --18:10, 4 Nov 2004 (EET)