Talk:Interwiki faction standard: Difference between revisions
it is good not to be sure!!
(using colors is problematic) |
(it is good not to be sure!!) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::A colour spectrum is one dimensional. Political field is a field and thus cannot be assigned a colour according to a colour spectrum. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 21:44, 14 Jul 2004 (EEST) | ::A colour spectrum is one dimensional. Political field is a field and thus cannot be assigned a colour according to a colour spectrum. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 21:44, 14 Jul 2004 (EEST) | ||
:::Nonsense. A colour spectrum is about 2.5-dimensional. Go use a paint program and you will see [[hue, saturation and lightness]] and [[red, green and blue]] and [[brightness and contrast]] and [[colour balance]] controls and a selection wheel that is clearly 2-dimensional at least. | |||
::::Umm. To be precice RGB is a '''light''' system as opposed to for instance CMYK, which is a '''color''' system. My mistake I should have said light when I wrote colour. Anyways this is off the point. All lights have a specific wave length in the spectrum, but as there can be many lights at the same time producing an infinite number of combinations they can be mapped to as many dimensions within a discreet value system i think, not sure though. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:38, 15 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
:::::It is good not to be sure. To not be sure is why you are a [[troll]]. To be the least sure is to be [[Lowest Troll]]. If you were sure, you would start to trust your own judgement too much and you would end up doing [[sysop vandalism]] like those other overly-certain people who join a [[sysop power structure]]. Lack of sureness is definitely the key attribute of we, [[trolls]]. It is our disbelief that we have understood "for sure" that leads to our respect for the [[New Troll point of view]], and our openness to the bona fide [[new troll]]. | |||