Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,850
edits
No edit summary |
(The above should be edited to take into account How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell. ) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There | There is not yet a decision on what (or which) Point of View(s) should be applied to provide reliable and user friendly [[Consumerium Services]] | ||
Many of these following articles are not to be taken seriously though they as a whole offer a view into the problems of deciding and unbiasedly enforcing a [[policy]] that is required | |||
*[[NPOV]] versus [[ | *'''[[Consumerium:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]]''' ([[NPOV]]) (applied at [[Wikipedia]]) versus '''[[Consumerium:Non-neutral point of view|Non-neutral point of view]]''' ([[NNPOV]]) - this is [[sysopism]] | ||
*[[ | *'''[[New Troll point of view]]''' versus '''[[NPOV]]''' - this is [[trollist]] | ||
*'''[[Multiple point of view]]''' ([[factionally defined]]) reconciled by some system like [[answer recommendation]], with '''[[Consensual point of view]]''' of processes required to generate [[Consumerium buying signal]] | |||
*'''[[Critical point of view]]''' versus '''[[Sympathetic point of view]]''' (applied at [[Wikinfo]]) (This is a redirect to [[Consensus]]) | |||
*'''[[Consumerium:Troll point of view|Troll point of view]]''' versus '''[[Sysop Vandal point of view]]''' | |||
Some [[trolls]] argue that [[NPOV]] is really just '''[[Community point of view]]''' in the best case and [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] in the worst case. | |||
'''The above should be edited to take into account [[How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell]].''' |