User talk:Matterhorn: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 6:

:Of course, offending the [[Wikimedia]] cabal will probably get you hacked off the net like [[Recyclopedia]] was, by Starling and Moeller's friends with their crapflooding [[vandalbot]]s. The correct response to this is legal however not more [[technological escalation]].

::I leave the above here for now, so that Juxo may look at it and comment.

::Recyclopedia was just a troll hangout, the only people who got hurt there were trolls.

:::This is provably false. It is also not an excuse for illegal acts such as those the Wikimedia cabal sponsored against Recyclopedia. Articles were being corrected there, a more democratic model of governance developed, both of which were threatening to specific [[sysop power structure]] promoters from Wikipedia.

::If criticising Wikimedia had anything to do with it, Consumerium would have been vandalised long ago. No, Consumerium is left alone because it has decent honest contributors and a purpose unrelated to trolling. -- [[User:Atag|Atag]] 10:25, 11 May 2004 (EEST)

:::The only way to know WHY Consumerium is left alone is to have been responsible for the initial attacks. Whoever believes this is almost certainly involved in the illegal attacks on Recyclopedia. Juxo, we request their IP number be revealed so that we can investigate who should be reported to authorities in the appropriate countries.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :Of course, offending the [[Wikimedia]] cabal will probably get you hacked off the net like [[Recyclopedia]] was, by Starling and Moeller's friends with their crapflooding [[vandalbot]]s.  The correct response to this is legal however not more [[technological escalation]].
+::I leave the above here for now, so that Juxo may look at it and comment.
+::Recyclopedia was just a troll hangout, the only people who got hurt there were trolls.
+:::This is provably false.  It is also not an excuse for illegal acts such as those the Wikimedia cabal sponsored against Recyclopedia.  Articles were being corrected there, a more democratic model of governance developed, both of which were threatening to specific [[sysop power structure]] promoters from Wikipedia.
+::If criticising Wikimedia had anything to do with it, Consumerium would have been vandalised long ago. No, Consumerium is left alone because it has decent honest contributors and a purpose unrelated to trolling. -- [[User:Atag|Atag]] 10:25, 11 May 2004 (EEST)
+:::The only way to know WHY Consumerium is left alone is to have been responsible for the initial attacks.  Whoever believes this is almost certainly involved in the illegal attacks on Recyclopedia.  Juxo, we request their IP number be revealed so that we can investigate who should be reported to authorities in the appropriate countries.