User talk:142.177.79.134: Difference between revisions
(foundation) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Yes very sensible. If we understand [[body]], [[not-body]] and [[Open Campaign]] we have a foundation. Then we can deal with the other six words by factions, then let them battle out multiple points of view to reach consensus. | :Yes very sensible. If we understand [[body]], [[not-body]] and [[Open Campaign]] we have a foundation. Then we can deal with the other six words by factions, then let them battle out multiple points of view to reach consensus. | ||
:Really going to [http:/act.greenpeace.org people who already know] helps much. | :Really going to [http://act.greenpeace.org people who already know] helps much. | ||
Yay. Good stuff. And not even a little bit of your normal totally dysfunctional "zero-loop" grammar | |||
Latest revision as of 08:57, 27 April 2003
Morning my favourite Troll. I just woke up and you've been busy all nite. I'll make some coffee and diff whatcha been upto now. I hope you like Identifying people. It's starting to make sense for the first time IMHO.
- Yes very sensible. If we understand body, not-body and Open Campaign we have a foundation. Then we can deal with the other six words by factions, then let them battle out multiple points of view to reach consensus.
- Really going to people who already know helps much.
Yay. Good stuff. And not even a little bit of your normal totally dysfunctional "zero-loop" grammar