Identifying people: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

Having identification data on someones person in the system without:

A) Explicit consent from the person in question

A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where? how? when?)

:Good questions. We must determine how to determine someone claiming to be someone is really that someone.

or

Line 8:

Line 9:

is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]

:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil". But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done". You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]". Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]]. So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think. Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data. Fair?

----

===~~On identifying companies~~===

==See also:==

[[Companies]] on the other hand should enjoy only minimal privacy. Basic approach is that companies are encouraged to register their identity within consumerium and their failure to do so might quickly result in that someone outside of the company registers the company into the system.

In such a case the company is notified that someone has filed initial minimum data on the company and the company is given a reasonable timeframe to register themself. If they don't respond in time then a bit is set that this company did not register itself even though they had been offered the chance, which will not look good with the default [[~~UI]] settings --[[User:Juxo|Juxo~~]]

* [[Identifying companies]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Having identification data on someones person in the system without:
-A) Explicit consent from the person in question
+A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where?  how?  when?)
+:Good questions. We must determine how to determine someone claiming to be someone is really that someone.
 or
@@ Line 8: / Line 9: @@
 is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that.  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
+:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil".  But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done".  You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]".  Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]].  So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think.  Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data.  Fair?
 ----
-===On identifying companies===
+==See also:==
-[[Companies]] on the other hand should enjoy only minimal privacy. Basic approach is that companies are encouraged to register their identity within consumerium and their failure to do so might quickly result in that someone outside of the company registers the company into the system.
-In such a case the company is notified that someone has filed initial minimum data on the company and the company is given a reasonable timeframe to register themself. If they don't respond in time then a bit is set that this company did not register itself even though they had been offered the chance, which will not look good with the default [[UI]] settings --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
+* [[Identifying companies]]