Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
Identifying people: Difference between revisions
m
moving company stuff from here....
(A clear stepdown from the ultimatum I wrote in Deleted nonsense. I still think that m:person_DTD is still totally unacceptable) |
m (moving company stuff from here....) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Having identification data on someones person in the system without: | Having identification data on someones person in the system without: | ||
A) Explicit consent from the person in question | A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where? how? when?) | ||
:Good questions. We must determine how to determine someone claiming to be someone is really that someone. | |||
or | or | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.) | B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.) | ||
is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]]. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] | is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] | ||
:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil". But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done". You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]". Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]]. So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think. Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data. Fair? | |||
---- | |||
==See also:== | |||
* [[Identifying companies]] | |||