Search results

...to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them. It is the most basic [[privacy]] concern that we can have regarding [[Consumerium Services]]. Any service ...nder [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those th

...or indirectly beyond a [[faction]]'s agreed upon [[threshold of acceptable risk]]. ...it is out of scope of Consumerium, except where it affects choices about [[privacy]] (especially [[identifying people]]), and is implied by a [[label]].

...systems as [[RFID]] more or less could be made to work with low [[privacy risk]] (you already [[trust]] Consumerium, so no extra trust is required...) for

...t, nor have "limits" sent around the network to create a further [[privacy risk]]: either the transaction succeeds, or it fails, and all in real time.

...effective way to deliver the [[Consumerium buying signal]], and [[privacy risk]] is not a concern, i.e. most of what is delivered is [[green light ad]]s,

...s]] but tends to be influential in the [[standard]]s, especially [[privacy risk]] measures, that eventually make [[RFID]] acceptable, and limit [[cop]] acc

...for the [[consumer privacy]] in our view. There is usually some [[privacy risk]] with new networking technology.

:[[w:political privacy]] is another matter entirely - some think it should not exist. Only real c ...ough so that casual snooping is impossible. Dectability adds an element of risk for a developer wanting to breach secrecy. Note that for breaches of secrec