Wikipedia (Reds): Difference between revisions
fate of Wikimedia in Reds' view, Richardchilton's perspective
(fixing cut off intro, adding introduction from Reds perspective) |
(fate of Wikimedia in Reds' view, Richardchilton's perspective) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Wikimedia]] is not the lawful nor responsible [[steward]] of the [[GFDL corpus]] but a gang of [[usurper]]s who seek to prevent other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s from placing themselves in a central position to distribute upgrades to that corpus. It is sometimes accused of collaborating with [[Bomis]]'s commercial interests and even more of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]]. It is very likely to be the targets of complaints and lawsuits especially from the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] that it has recently censored. | [[Wikimedia]] is not the lawful nor responsible [[steward]] of the [[GFDL corpus]] but a gang of [[usurper]]s who seek to prevent other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s from placing themselves in a central position to distribute upgrades to that corpus. It is sometimes accused of collaborating with [[Bomis]]'s commercial interests and even more of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]]. It is very likely to be the targets of complaints and lawsuits especially from the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] that it has recently censored. | ||
This [[clique]] also regularly authorizes and encourages censorship of articles of interest to [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] such as [[w:Genuine Progress Indicator]]. | |||
In general, [[Reds]] consider there to be no negotiating nor accomodation with [[Wikimedia]] but view the [[troll-sysop struggle]] there as directly towards ultimately [[ending Wikimedia]] and replacing it with a more accountable structure with no history of [[GodKing]]s nor [[priestly hierarchy]] nor [[command hierarchy]]. ''See the analysis of [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]] for more on the prospect of withdrawing and helping destroy it from a distance.'' | |||
==Wikipedia Itself== | ==Wikipedia Itself== | ||