Integrity: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(typo) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity. | '''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have to talk about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity. | ||
[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity: | [[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity: | ||
*[[trolls]] who seem far to be happy but might at any time bite us on the leg | |||
*accusations of [[m:bias|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias] | *accusations of [[m:bias|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias] | ||
*plain [[m:liars |liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies | *plain [[m:liars |liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies | ||
*[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]]) | *[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]]) | ||
**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll|troll]]) | **[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll|the good type of troll]]) | ||
**[[w:precedent|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one | **[[w:precedent|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one | ||
**[[w:groupthink|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader | **[[w:groupthink|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader | ||
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view] | *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view] | ||
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us | *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us | ||
*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]] | |||
*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view|valid, natural, point of view]] | *claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view|valid, natural, point of view]] | ||
How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else. | How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else. So far, [[trolls]] say, it does better than any other wikipedia3 site! | ||