Talk:Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions

broker a deal?
(moving Moeller and Starling concerns as they are not officers of Wikimedia)
(broker a deal?)
Line 98: Line 98:


:how can one libel an organization whose sole purpose seems to be libel?  Hmm.
:how can one libel an organization whose sole purpose seems to be libel?  Hmm.
-----------
Is it actually acceptable to simply remove [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Daniel Mayer]] publicly?  Will those subjected to [[libel]] by these people actually back off if they are publicly removed and Wales apologizes?  Or is Wales, himself, the ultimate problem, due to his history as a [[GodKing]] and so on?
[[Trolls]] are unlikely to all agree on this.  Perhaps the debate on a [[negotiated settlement between trolls and Wikimedia]] should be very public.
If [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] brokers such a deal, its prestige will rise, and it will effectively be more trusted than [[Wikimedia]] by defn.
Anonymous user