Jump to content

Consumerium Research pilot: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(aren't actual destroyers of ecosystems, species, peoples, better targets than a trollherd, reputed or real? priorities, please)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Such a focused '''pilot''' that deliberately sought to gain both publicity and a meaningful test of how tough and sue-proof we can make our policies, would stress organizational issues central to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]].  We would identify the potential for being sued for [[diluting the trademark]], [[libel chill]], other more fatuous basis for [[lawsuit]]s and other potential problems.  At the very least we'd learn to process a [[cease and desist letter]] and send a polite response threatening total [[troll war]] against companies that lie about [[Consumerium]], followed by [[suing for funding]].
Such a focused '''pilot''' that deliberately sought to gain both publicity and a meaningful test of how tough and sue-proof we can make our policies, would stress organizational issues central to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]].  We would identify the potential for being sued for [[diluting the trademark]], [[libel chill]], other more fatuous basis for [[lawsuit]]s and other potential problems.  At the very least we'd learn to process a [[cease and desist letter]] and send a polite response threatening total [[troll war]] against companies that lie about [[Consumerium]], followed by [[suing for funding]].


In such [[pilot]] projects, often the users are chosen specifically to be difficult to support, if the anticipated issue of deployment is the variety of users, i.e. [[trolls]] especially [[funded troll]]s, in [[Research Wiki]] and in [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and [[sysop vandalism]] advocates.  In September 2004, such advocates of the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] seem to be republishing nonsense from that POV, e.g. the [[Craig Hubley]] article.  In some cases they have also indicated an interested in learning about [[trolling]] and declared it "fun".  This is all possibly a positive sign that at least some [[sysop vandal]]s can turn their hate towards companies or people that really deserve it, e.g. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] rather than some [[trollherd]].
In such [[pilot]] projects, often the users are chosen specifically to be difficult to support, if the anticipated issue of deployment is the variety of users, i.e. [[trolls]] especially [[funded troll]]s, in [[Research Wiki]] and in [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and [[sysop vandalism]] advocates.  In September 2004, [[Alleged and collective identity|supposed advocates]] of the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] seem to be republishing writings from that POV, e.g. the [[Craig Hubley]] article.  In some cases they have also indicated an interested in learning about [[trolling]] and declared it "fun".  This is all possibly a positive sign that at least some alleged [[sysop vandal]]s (their [[alleged and collective identity|true self-identification]] remains unknown) can turn their hate towards companies or people that really deserve it, e.g. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] rather than some [[trollherd]].


To test the extent of these conflicts and the [[tit for tat]] tactics they engender, we need an actual [[Research Wiki]] up and running;  One with real [[intermediate page]]s that [[Consumerium:We|we]] can fight about.  Elements of this '''pilot''' include:
To test the extent of these conflicts and the [[tit for tat]] tactics they engender, we need an actual [[Research Wiki]] up and running;  One with real [[intermediate page]]s that [[Consumerium:We|we]] can fight about.  Elements of this '''pilot''' include:
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.