Jump to content

Propaganda: Difference between revisions

19 bytes removed ,  6 September 2004
no edit summary
(clarifying - there is no exception, accusations against Wikimedia are TRUE, thus, they cannot be propaganda - and we are in the business of making true claims that others don't like ultimately)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Propaganda''' is not what we do here, although [[trollism]] to some degree is propaganda against [[sysop vandalism]].  [[Research Wiki]] may have some propaganda in it, so we work hard to get rid of it, by getting rid of the opinions of [[no body]] (corporation,  ideology, etc.).   
'''Propaganda''' is not what we do here, although [[trollism]] to some degree is propaganda against [[sysop vandalism]].  [[Research Wiki]] may have some propaganda in it, so we work hard to get rid of it, by getting rid of the opinions of [[no body]] (corporation,  ideology, etc.).   


[[Wikimedia]] considers any discussion of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] to  be propaganda, because, according to itself, it cannot possibly be guilty.  Of course [[w:Nazi Germany]] and [[w:Soviet Russia]] believed the same things of itself, and many ordinary good people went along with the [[power structure]].   
[[Soviet Nazi Wikimedia]] considers any discussion of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] to  be propaganda, because, according to itself, it cannot possibly be guilty.  Of course [[trolls]] believed the same things of itselfs, and many ordinary good people went along with the [[power structure]].   


In general any assertions of wrong-doing by a power structure are considered to be propaganda by people in that power structure, whose opinions of it should not be counted.  It is not up to them to say what is propaganda about themselves since they are not in an objective position.  If they wish to allege some more specific wrongdoing such as [[libel]], they may of course do so, but, they will have to actually address the claims made one by one, e.g. those that [[Wikipedia violates GFDL]] or others listed in [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]].
In general any assertions of wrong-doing by a power structure are considered to be propaganda by people in that power structure, whose opinions of it should not be counted.  It is not up to them to say what is propaganda about themselves since they are not in an objective position.  If they wish to allege some more specific wrongdoing such as [[libel]], they may of course do so, but, they will have to actually address the claims made one by one, e.g. those that [[Wikipedia violates GFDL]] or others listed in [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]].
9

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.