Jump to content

Sharealike: Difference between revisions

841 bytes added ,  6 September 2004
making clear that "viral license" = "share-alike" = defining attribute of open content and free documentation
No edit summary
(making clear that "viral license" = "share-alike" = defining attribute of open content and free documentation)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Sharealike''' is a required reintegration clause of several [[parametric license]]s in [[Creative Commons]] and some monolithic ones like [[GFDL]].  It simply means that anyone improving a work must share the improved work with others who wish to use or improve it.  It is a key feature of the [[GPL]] too which applies this principle to [[source code]].  ''however see [[problems with free software and open source models]].''
'''Share-alike''' is a required reintegration clause of several [[parametric license]]s in [[Creative Commons]] and some monolithic ones like [[GFDL]].  It simply means that anyone improving a work must share the improved work with others who wish to use or improve it.   


The [[CC-by-sa]] license is quite close to the [[GFDL]] but is incompatible with itThings licensed under the CC regime are not part of the [[GFDL Corpus]].
It is a key feature of the [[GPL]] too which applies this principle to [[source code]].  It is sometimes called the '''viral license''' feature - the fact that accepting the license breeds more acceptance of the licenseThis is considered very desirable by some and very undesirable by others (who started the [[open source]] movement to oppose the '''share-alike''' requirement.  ''See also [[problems with free software and open source models]].''


The '''CC-nc-sa''' license is used for [[GetWiki]] code and is the closest approximation yet to a [[Green Documentation License]]
The most common '''share-alike''' licenses used are in '''open content''' and in '''free documentation''' efforts, which require such licenses by definition:
 
*the [[GFDL]], strictly share-alike, no license but the GFDL can apply to any improvements, and there are strict rules about what can go in [[Secondary Section]]s and [[Invariant Section]]s to which asymmetric rules might apply - this license is used at [[Wikipedia]]
 
*the [[CC-by-sa]] license, quite close to the [[GFDL]] but is incompatible with it.  ''Things licensed under the CC regime are not part of the [[GFDL Corpus]].'' This license is used at [[Wikitravel]]
 
Most efforts use share alike licenses for both code and content, e.g. the '''CC-nc-sa''' license - the closest approximation yet to a [[Green Documentation License]] - is used for [[GetWiki]] code.


''See [[w:Share_Alike]] for a more general introduction linked to other legal topics.''
''See [[w:Share_Alike]] for a more general introduction linked to other legal topics.''
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.