Jump to content

Political economy: Difference between revisions

150 bytes removed ,  26 April 2003
link fix
No edit summary
 
(link fix)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Political economy''' is the political choices that frame economic (buying and consuming) choices.  Usually political parties and ideologies claim to have a [[w:formal method of evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions|clear ethical or moral system]].  [[Consumerium]] may help them do that.
'''Political economy''' is the political choices that frame economic (buying and consuming) choices.  Usually political parties and ideologies claim to have a [[w:Formal_method_for_evaluating_and_quantifying_ethicality_and_morality_of_human_actions|ethical or moral system]]|clear ethical or moral system]].  [[Consumerium]] may help them do that.


''The following was deleted as speculative after sitting for a year as part of the [[w:moral purchasing|Wikipedia moral purchasing article]], and having been edited by many people:  Links are to Wikipedia articles to retain the original context of the section:''
''The following was deleted as speculative after sitting for a year as part of the [[w:moral purchasing|Wikipedia moral purchasing article]], and having been edited by many people:  Links are to Wikipedia articles to retain the original context of the section:''
Line 6: Line 6:


=== a new political economy? ===
=== a new political economy? ===
                                                          �
 
Recent events suggest that [[w:asymmetric warfare|asymmetric warfare]] remains effective even against the most [[w:developed nation|developed nations]], which are necessarily more "open societies" and thus more subject to such threats as [[w:biowar|biowar]]. Liabilities which were never accounted for in global business or military dealings are now moving from [[w:threat|threat]] to a probable [[w:risk|risk]] - and therefore altering many economic decisions.
Recent events suggest that [[w:asymmetric warfare|asymmetric warfare]] remains effective even against the most [[w:developed nation|developed nations]], which are necessarily more "open societies" and thus more subject to such threats as [[w:biowar|biowar]]. Liabilities which were never accounted for in global business or military dealings are now moving from [[w:threat|threat]] to a probable [[w:risk|risk]] - and therefore altering many economic decisions.
                                                          �
 
Various unusual threat scenarios, e.g. flooded farmers in [[w:Bangaladesh|Bangaladesh]] blaming U.S. CO2 output for their loss of land to monsoons, e.g. Chinese peasants moved out of the way of the [[w:Three Gorges Dam|Three Gorges Dam]] flooding holding the Canadian bankers who seeded the project liable for their loss, are often suggested, especially in the [[w:anti-globalization movement|anti-globalization movement]]. Although scenarios are often far-fetched, the [[w:mass mobilization|mass mobilization]] of many bodies in protests where there is shared risk of [[w:bodily harm|bodily harm]] suggests strongly to leaders that people in [[w:developing nation|developing nation]]s affected by their choices have not only sympathizers, but active agents, in the developed nations.
Various unusual threat scenarios, e.g. flooded farmers in [[w:Bangaladesh|Bangaladesh]] blaming U.S. CO2 output for their loss of land to monsoons, e.g. Chinese peasants moved out of the way of the [[w:Three Gorges Dam|Three Gorges Dam]] flooding holding the Canadian bankers who seeded the project liable for their loss, are often suggested, especially in the [[w:anti-globalization movement|anti-globalization movement]]. Although scenarios are often far-fetched, the [[w:mass mobilization|mass mobilization]] of many bodies in protests where there is shared risk of [[w:bodily harm|bodily harm]] suggests strongly to leaders that people in [[w:developing nation|developing nation]]s affected by their choices have not only sympathizers, but active agents, in the developed nations.
                                                          �
 
It remains to be seen if these pressures will ultimately mold a new and global '''political economy''', or if the existing system of global [[w:capitalism|capitalism]] can stand the strain. This seems, to some, an inseparable goal from that of [[w:world government|world government]] or [[w:global justice|global justice]]. And, indeed, advocates of moving towards such goals do often support moral purchasing - and a new '''political economy''' that would hold each of us ultimately responsible for all that we consume.   
It remains to be seen if these pressures will ultimately mold a new and global '''political economy''', or if the existing system of global [[w:capitalism|capitalism]] can stand the strain. This seems, to some, an inseparable goal from that of [[w:world government|world government]] or [[w:global justice|global justice]]. And, indeed, advocates of moving towards such goals do often support moral purchasing - and a new '''political economy''' that would hold each of us ultimately responsible for all that we consume.   


See also: [[w:morality|morality]], [[w:ethical investing|ethical investing]], [[w:money|money]], [[w:political economy|(old Wikipedia article on) political economy]]
See also: [[w:morality|morality]], [[w:ethical investing|ethical investing]], [[w:money|money]], [[w:political economy|(old Wikipedia article on) political economy]]
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.