Jump to content

Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions

implications for trolls
(doesn't this belong in an encyclopedia or something?)
 
(implications for trolls)
Line 1: Line 1:
This seems like a long-winded and general way of saying what is already said at [[ontological distinction]] anyway.  This long version belongs in [[Wikipedia]] or [[Wikinfo]] not here probably.
This seems like a long-winded and general way of saying what is already said at [[ontological distinction]] anyway.  This long version belongs in [[Wikipedia]] or [[Wikinfo]] not here probably.
The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting.  If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being.  The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other.  Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]?  God's cognition implies all beings?
By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.