Jump to content

Talk:Export-import: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(is this worth pursuing? probably not - new software will be required, and it's probably custom)
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


They haven't even cloned the [[GetWiki]] facility yet, and it's the ideal way to keep those who [[fork off]] the [[GFDL corpus]] as close to the core corpus as possible.  That is of course because they are trying to stop all other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s, and retain [[trademark]] power over the name "wikipedia", which is actually generic.  There are many wikipedias, and the contributor is not seeking to enable or give their work to any specific bunch of "[[Wikimedia]]" thugs, they're seeking to give it to all wikipedias.
They haven't even cloned the [[GetWiki]] facility yet, and it's the ideal way to keep those who [[fork off]] the [[GFDL corpus]] as close to the core corpus as possible.  That is of course because they are trying to stop all other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s, and retain [[trademark]] power over the name "wikipedia", which is actually generic.  There are many wikipedias, and the contributor is not seeking to enable or give their work to any specific bunch of "[[Wikimedia]]" thugs, they're seeking to give it to all wikipedias.
We should be more concerned with [[edits, votes and bets]] and how [[answer recommendation]] might move things from [[Research Wiki]] to [[Publish Wiki]].  Importing a lot of sysop-approved biased nonsense from [[Wikipedia]] should be low on our list of priorities.  Why not just use [[GetWiki]] and get it from [[Wikinfo]] instead?
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.