Talk:Wikimedia: Difference between revisions
how to avoid repeating this mistake?
("Wikimedia" is a front group for Erik Moeller and Tim Starling, and will always rubber-stamp whatever abuses they commit, it appears at the moment) |
(how to avoid repeating this mistake?) |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
[[w:User:Enforcer]] is making legal threats against Wikimedia: "Investigation of non-compliance with Florida charitabale solicitations law" -- see [[w:User talk:Enforcer]]. Jim Wales has commented [[w:User talk:Jimbo Wales|here]] and [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-May/012309.html here]. The user has been blocked by [[w:User:Eloquence]] with reason: "trolling / libel against Wikimedia foundation" | [[w:User:Enforcer]] is making legal threats against Wikimedia: "Investigation of non-compliance with Florida charitabale solicitations law" -- see [[w:User talk:Enforcer]]. Jim Wales has commented [[w:User talk:Jimbo Wales|here]] and [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-May/012309.html here]. The user has been blocked by [[w:User:Eloquence]] with reason: "trolling / libel against Wikimedia foundation" | ||
:This just proves that any attempt to call this "foundation" to even its bare legal requirements of accountability will be met with censorship and libel as a response. | :This just proves that any attempt to call this "foundation" to even its bare legal requirements of accountability will be met with censorship, name-calling and [[libel chill]] as a response. | ||
:Also see [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-May/000038.html this from Anthere] which clearly demonstrates that decisions are made by [[usurper]]s doing [[developer vigilantiism]] (Moeller, Starling) who don't consult with this "foundation" before making legal and usability and other decisions. The whole thing is a front group for Moeller and Starling now. | :Also see [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-May/000038.html this from Anthere] which clearly demonstrates that decisions are made by [[usurper]]s doing [[developer vigilantiism]] (Moeller, Starling) who don't consult with this "foundation" before making legal and usability and other decisions. The whole thing is a front group for Moeller and Starling now. It has no credibility. | ||
:How can [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] avoid being hijacked by some similar gang of thugs? | |||