6
edits
Talk:Wikimedia: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
Matterhorn (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
See [[m:Meta:Deletion log]] | See [[m:Meta:Deletion log]] | ||
I removed all of the following from the main article, because it is mostly nonsense. | |||
*Refusing to release [[Most Clicked Links]] information on any [[Wikipedia]], even the small ones, where tracking this information would be quite simple, and would assist authors in supporting real end user interests. | |||
::They are in no way obliged to reveal this information. If you have a problem with this go create a [[fork]] of [[Wikipedia]]. Some have tried it. | |||
:::Actually, this claim is completely and totally false. There has been no refusal of any kind to release any data of this kind. Additionally, I can find no evidence that anyone is even asking for this, or | |||
that any one has ever been critical (except here on this page) of us for this imagined fault. | |||
*Releasing only very limited page visit information - maybe due to the performance cost it adds | |||
::: Again, completely false. There is no truth to this at all. | |||
*Treating use of [[ISO]] language codes in [[mediawiki]]'s [[interwiki link standard|interwiki link conventions]] as if they are invocations of Wikipedia in that language, not simply references to "that page in that language". | |||
::But the interwiki links point to the page in another language | |||
:::This complaint is completely incoherent. If the original complainant could explain himself, I'm sure that any such problem would be eagerly addressed. | |||
*Banning, harassing, [[outing|attempting to "out"]] and permitting (if not deliberately attempting) [[framing]] users who point out any of the above. This sometimes reaches the bizarre extreme of [[echo chamber]] assertions being cited in Wikipedia articles as if they were true. | |||
:The most common criticism of Wikipedia is that the community is too open and welcoming and tolerant of people who have no willingness to work together in a healthy way with others. Such people are indeed angered when, after months of agonizing deliberations and attempts to find ways to | |||
compromise, they are eventually banned. Most wikipedians seem to feel that Jimbo has always been too lenient about such matters. | |||