User:Jukeboksi/Blog/April2004: Difference between revisions
Erik Moeller has made very specific claims that are anti-consensus, not necessarily fascist, and lived up to them using technocratic means (sysop vandalism); does that mean he "is" a fascist? dunno
No edit summary |
(Erik Moeller has made very specific claims that are anti-consensus, not necessarily fascist, and lived up to them using technocratic means (sysop vandalism); does that mean he "is" a fascist? dunno) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
we don't care worry about them ripping us off like we [http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=265 originally planned to do] to what is now known as [[Wikimedia]]. I'm sad that our [[trolls]] have [[receed|receded]] to calling user-accounts, people or semi-people, [[trollherd]] or whatever you want or facsists and racists on [[Consumerium]]. [[Consumerium:Itself]]s inability to react promptly to such accusations is a disgrace. | we don't care worry about them ripping us off like we [http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=265 originally planned to do] to what is now known as [[Wikimedia]]. I'm sad that our [[trolls]] have [[receed|receded]] to calling user-accounts, people or semi-people, [[trollherd]] or whatever you want or facsists and racists on [[Consumerium]]. [[Consumerium:Itself]]s inability to react promptly to such accusations is a disgrace. | ||
::The [[Lowest Troll]] did in fact respond at [[Talk:Wikimedia]] and was refuted - obviously wrong on many counts about the rules of meta, who wrote the material, why it was deleted, and who originated the terms. Erik Moeller is an [[enemy projects|enemy]] - there is now apparently a "troll jihad" against him, maybe for his overt political opposition to [[w:consensus decision making]] - something he ignorantly announces on his own [[w:User:Eloquence]] page. But the only obvious racist is EN: Wikipedia: User: RickK. There are three or four obvious fascists, but, they may only be fascists in this one silly online context. All "accusations" have been backed up with exact quoted evidence, unlike the ones they make with thelir [[echo chamber]]. And all of this is only relevant "here" insofar as it determines who not to work with (like [[Wikimedia]]. | ::The [[Lowest Troll]] did in fact respond at [[Talk:Wikimedia]] and was refuted - obviously wrong on many counts about the rules of meta, who wrote the material, why it was deleted, and who originated the terms. Erik Moeller is an [[enemy projects|enemy]] - there is now apparently a "troll jihad" against him, maybe for his overt political opposition to [[w:consensus decision making]] - something he ignorantly announces on his own [[w:User:Eloquence]] page (having obviously not read the article which answers all his made-up "concerns", at least, until he performs [[sysop vandalism]] on that article too, to "make his opinion correct" as seems to be his habit). But the only obvious racist is EN: Wikipedia: User: RickK. There are three or four obvious fascists, but, they may only be fascists in this one silly online context. All "accusations" have been backed up with exact quoted evidence, unlike the ones they make with thelir [[echo chamber]]. And all of this is only relevant "here" insofar as it determines who not to work with (like [[Wikimedia]]. | ||
::The real shame is that [[Wikimedia]] exists at all. It is an extreme disgrace. | ::The real shame is that [[Wikimedia]] exists at all. It is an extreme disgrace. | ||