Jump to content

Deforestation: Difference between revisions

92 bytes added ,  7 April 2004
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''See [[w:deforestation]].''
''See [[w:deforestation]].''


'''Deforestation''' is a [[bad thing]] and figures in some [[worst cases]].  Unfortunately, it's hard to imagine how [[threats]] could exist, other than "all forests disappear and all things on Earth die as a direct result".
'''Deforestation''' is a [[bad thing]] and figures in some [[worst cases]].  ''Unfortunately, it's hard to imagine how [[threats]] could exist, other than "all forests disappear and all things on Earth die as a direct result". (Some people would believe even that, making it a worst case, not a dystopia.''


[[Charcoal]] and [[tantallum]] are things whose creation often cause deforestation.  When they do, this makes the charcoal and tantallum also [[bad thing]]s, as the [[comprehensive outcome]] of their [[production]] is beyond what is acceptable for a [[healthy buying infrastructure]].
[[Charcoal]] and [[tantallum]] are things whose creation often cause deforestation.  When they do, this makes the charcoal and tantallum also [[bad thing]]s, as the [[comprehensive outcome]] of their [[production]] is beyond what is acceptable for a [[healthy buying infrastructure]].


"Policy and market failure alone cannot explain rapid deforestation, concludes Wunder (Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen), and finds that with current technologies, market prices, and disparate stakeholder interests, natural forest uses in Ecuador tend to yield less income than alternative land uses, mainly agro-pastoral. The only effect curb on deforestation, he says, would be payments for global forest benefits as an integral element of conservation incentives on the ground" [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0312234465/103-9114637-7092655?v=glance] [[Sven Wunder]]
"Policy and market failure alone cannot explain rapid deforestation, concludes [[Sven Wunder]] (Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen), and finds that with current technologies, market prices, and disparate stakeholder interests, [[natural forest use]]s in [[Ecuador]] tend to yield less income than alternative land uses, mainly [[agro-pastoral]]. The only effect curb on deforestation, he says, would be payments for [[global forest benefits]] as an integral element of conservation incentives on the ground" [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0312234465/103-9114637-7092655?v=glance]
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.