Talk:Interwiki link standard: Difference between revisions
putting the point in the right place
(bah - PHP hackers are mere script kiddies, and the retardation of the GFDL text corpus is a direct result of not segmenting it language-first) |
(putting the point in the right place) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
you would be pretty close to the [[Interwiki]] "standard" as it is now '''implemented already''' | you would be pretty close to the [[Interwiki]] "standard" as it is now '''implemented already''' | ||
::YES, EXACTLY. BUT THE LANGUAGE MUST COME FIRST!! THE WHOLE SEMANTIC WEB AND ALL TRANSLATION AND OTHER CAPABILITIES DEPEND ON THE LANGUAGE COMING FIRST. IT IS NOT UP TO THE "SERVICE" HOW TO TRANSLATE A PAGE, NECESSARILY. Hell even in "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/page" the "en" comes first. That's for a reason. And so is this. And please don't waste my time by telling me about subdomains (those shouldn't be distinct from subdirectories, in a uniform name space). | |||
As a result, a reference to "[ [ en: Metaweb: phyle ] ]" will be interpreted incorrectly as a reference to English Wikipedia where there is no article, instead of correctly to [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=phyle English Metaweb 'phyle'] where there is one. | As a result, a reference to "[ [ en: Metaweb: phyle ] ]" will be interpreted incorrectly as a reference to English Wikipedia where there is no article, instead of correctly to [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=phyle English Metaweb 'phyle'] where there is one. | ||