User:Jukeboksi/Blog/February2004: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(dialogues are useful to show underlying attitudes)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
10.2.2004
10.2.2004


:Trolls request that [[User:Juxo]] state some opinion about the issue at [[User_talk:Angela]] (deleting talk files that contain clear warnings about things like use of [[echo chamber]] tactics).  Trolls don't object to moving certain advice to not trust certain people to [[142.X.X.X/Flames]] but we do object to simply deleting talk without answering to any of the points therein.  (11.2.2004:  note the totally different attitude obvious in [[142.X.X.X/Tim_Starling]] vs. that in [[142.X.X.X/Angela]] - some people know what the issues are, others don't, and these dialogues help make that clear.)
:Trolls request that [[User:Juxo]] state some opinion about the issue at [[User_talk:Angela]] (deleting talk files that contain clear warnings about things like use of [[echo chamber]] tactics).  Trolls don't object to moving certain advice to not trust certain people to [[142.X.X.X/Flames]] but we do object to simply deleting talk without answering to any of the points therein.  (11.2.2004:  note the totally different attitude obvious in [[142.X.X.X/Tim_Starling]] vs. that in [[142.X.X.X/Angela]] - some people know what the issues are, others don't care and just excuse themselves based on what others are doing, and these dialogues help make that crystal clear.)


:Also, since Wikipedian Trash seem to be willing to come here, there's no good reason to believe that quality people wasting their time at Wikipedia fighting them might not like to come here also, where there's a more level playing field.
:Also, since Wikipedian Trash seem to be willing to come here, there's no good reason to believe that quality people wasting their time at Wikipedia fighting them might not like to come here also, where there's a more level playing field.  And more intelligent beliefs about [[Consumerium Governance]] at least.


4.2.2004
4.2.2004
Anonymous user