Talk:142.177.X.X: Difference between revisions
if anything we don't have ENOUGH open links, and yes, it's time to consolidate, and am doing rewrites to clarify things causing confusion
(please don't redlink so much. please don't write new stubs but let's focus on making some good articles. please use the Summary as it'd be really kind towards other contributors) |
(if anything we don't have ENOUGH open links, and yes, it's time to consolidate, and am doing rewrites to clarify things causing confusion) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Please mellow down writing new stubbish articles and let's focus on making the existing ones a little more coherent if you please. Thank you. | Please mellow down writing new stubbish articles and let's focus on making the existing ones a little more coherent if you please. Thank you. | ||
:It was a one-shot to try to knock off most of the Most Wanted Articles that had definitions I already had clearly in mind. I left a note on your blog page to tell ''you'' that it was time to start making articles more coherent and better cross-linked. | |||
And please don't do like this: [[useless and distractive article provocation]] instead '''put it in bold font face'''. We have so many articles that please don't write any new ones unless really necessary since we need to attract more possible contributors (people) not drive them away. I know '''focus''' is a word that has suffered lots of inflation due to you know the reason, but we need to '''focus'''. Yes. | And please don't do like this: [[useless and distractive article provocation]] instead '''put it in bold font face'''. We have so many articles that please don't write any new ones unless really necessary since we need to attract more possible contributors (people) not drive them away. I know '''focus''' is a word that has suffered lots of inflation due to you know the reason, but we need to '''focus'''. Yes. | ||
:ALL those links were ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL and ALL have been restored. If anything there are not ENOUGH of these links - the [[R&D wiki]] will eventually have at least 1000 pages, so, when it has only 500, you must expect fully half of them to be open links. If you don't like this, reduce the scope of the project - don't VANDALIZE the project by making "Most Wanted Pages" useless. <--- this is the only way to find what is unexplained. Putting in bold face is the convention ONLY for when you have FULLY EXPLAINED an issue in one page with other issues, and make it a redirect. This MUST NEVER be done for just some casual point you want to emphasize. | |||
:I agree no new ones should be written unless necessary. In my best judgement every single one that has been opened is necessary, either because it's unique to Consumerium or because we need ONE PARAGRAPH on such complex questions as [[Richard Stallman]] or [[patent]] to avoid sending people off to waste time at [[Wikipedia]] when they really just wanted to know "why do I care about this in the context of Consumerium?" | |||
And one more thing. Do use the '''Summary-feature''' please. It'd be really nice for the busy busy people who don't have all day and night to go through some obscure edits | And one more thing. Do use the '''Summary-feature''' please. It'd be really nice for the busy busy people who don't have all day and night to go through some obscure edits | ||
:Will do. | |||