Jump to content

Bad copy problem: Difference between revisions

58 bytes added ,  24 November 2003
fix useless redlinking
No edit summary
 
(fix useless redlinking)
Line 4: Line 4:


To some degree this has already happened to [[free software]] in several ways:
To some degree this has already happened to [[free software]] in several ways:
#[[open source]] is to a degree a "bad copy" of the free software concept that lures in many contributors who would otherwise contribute to free software
#open source is to a degree a "bad copy" of the free software concept that lures in many contributors who would otherwise contribute to free software
#[[open source]] licenses themselves allow developers to extend and "protect" their extensions under [[patent]] law or independent [[copyright]]
#open source licenses themselves allow developers to extend and "protect" their extensions under patent law or independent copyright, unlike in free software licenses
#the extreme variety of versions of o.s. and f.s. systems like [[Linux]] makes it impossibly difficult to concentrate maintenance and usability effort, making for an OS that is hard for the ordinary user to maintain due to sheer dilution and confusion
#the extreme variety of versions of operating systems and file systems like [[w:Linux|Linux]] makes it impossibly difficult to concentrate maintenance and usability effort, making for an OS that is hard for the ordinary user to maintain due to sheer dilution and confusion
#[[Richard Stallman]] himself has objected to Linux incorporating many GNU utilities and not calling itself "GNU Linux", but the [[GPL]] never asked for this nor applied any [[trademark]] or other instrument that would make this a condition of re-use of those utilities;  Presumably, having ''one'' "GNU Linux" would make it easier to tell the best version(s) from dozens of nasty variants.
#[[w:Richard Stallman|Richard Stallman]] himself has objected to Linux incorporating many GNU utilities and not calling itself "GNU Linux", but the [[GPL]] never asked for this nor applied any [[trademark]] or other instrument that would make this a condition of re-use of those utilities;  Presumably, having ''one'' "GNU Linux" would make it easier to tell the best version(s) from dozens of nasty variants.


It's also happened to [[wiki code]].  There are a huge number of versions that seem to exist for no particular reason other than that someone wanted to write a wiki  (see [[self-interested fork problem]]).  This drastically dilutes the effort available to make any of them of any use.
It's also happened to [[wiki code]].  There are a huge number of versions that seem to exist for no particular reason other than that someone wanted to write a wiki  (see [[self-interested fork problem]]).  This drastically dilutes the effort available to make any of them of any use.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.