Semantic web of views: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''semantic web of views''' is a fictional way to represent [[instructional capital]]. It combines [[semantic web]], [[politics as usual]], [[business as usual]] and in the end is supposed to somehow end up neat, clean and agreed on. | The '''semantic web of views''' is a fictional way to represent [[instructional capital]]. It combines [[semantic web]], [[politics as usual]], [[business as usual]] and in the end is supposed to somehow end up neat, clean and agreed on. | ||
This seems unlikely, if not stupid. | This seems unlikely, if not stupid. [[Wikinfo]] is the closest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question: | ||
:''Can one objectively define a [[point of view]] and [[what to accept as fact|statements regarding reality]] that are clearly attributable to that view?'' | |||
::If so, [[faction]]s are the obvious way forward | |||
::If not, then clearly a [[Research Wiki]] or even a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]". | |||