Developer usurpation: Difference between revisions
both are legitimate definitions
(Clarify) |
(both are legitimate definitions) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[[Developer]] usurpation''' is a pheomonen in [[real estate]] in which a developer puts pressure on local government to use its power of [[eminent domain]] to reapportion land ownership without just consideration of the public good. | '''[[Developer]] usurpation''' is a pheomonen in [[real estate]] in which a developer puts pressure on local government to use its power of [[eminent domain]] to reapportion land ownership without just consideration of the public good. | ||
[[Corruption]] and [[bribery]] are sometimes involved. | In a [[wiki]], the equivalent is when a [[usurper]] with technical skills or technological access that the ordinary [[sysop]] doesn't have, over-rides the [[sysop power structure]] to put [[block IP]] measures or other restrictions in place that make it impossible for the [[sysop]] to undo what the developer does. This reapportions user attention to suit the developer, over-riding the [[due process]]. | ||
This is a power play of the most extreme kind, and strongly frowned upon even when it is done under the direct order of a [[GodKing]]. It makes it obvious that there is a [[power structure]] that is quite different from that which is "negotiated" in the "virtual community" - and in fact proves that there is no such community or community-managed space, but merely something like a corporate shopping mall, where presence is at the sufference of security guards. | |||
[[Corruption]] and [[bribery]] are sometimes involved, in either the real estate or wiki version of this phenomena. | |||