Jump to content

Edits, votes and bets: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(expanding a bit, turning into a list of possibly non-exclusive options)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
How '''[[edits]], [[voting|votes]] and [[betting|bets]]''' affect the [[Consumerium buying signal]] (via the [[Signal Wiki]] directly and the [[Research Wiki]] indirectly) is up for debate.  ''See [[Opinion Wiki]], the old name for the research wiki, for a more complete description of functions, though it includes some that may have to be separated, like [[Campaign]]s.''
How '''[[edits]], [[voting|votes]] and [[betting|bets]]''' affect the [[Consumerium buying signal]] (via the [[Signal Wiki]] directly and the [[Research Wiki]] indirectly) is up for debate.  ''See [[Opinion Wiki]], the old name for the research wiki, for a more complete description of functions, though it includes some that may have to be separated, like [[Campaign]]s.''
This applies to [[controversial edit]]s almost exclusively:  Non-controversial edits don't need any one else to edit them afterwards.  They don't need to be voted on.  And they don't need anyone betting on them or against them with a [[revert currency]].  But if it's controversial, one or more of those things will happen!


This is probably the design issue that is hardest to resolve, as different [[faction]]s typically view these in quite a different manner.   
This is probably the design issue that is hardest to resolve, as different [[faction]]s typically view these in quite a different manner.   
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.