Jump to content

Viral license: Difference between revisions

924 bytes removed ,  6 September 2004
#REDIRECT share-alike - just a synonym
(required reintegration *is* a part of making a license viral - without it, new software under new licenses can be produced, thus making the original license not apply)
(#REDIRECT share-alike - just a synonym)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
See [[GPL]] and other [[free software]] [[license]]s to understand the details of what is meant by a '''viral license'''. 
#REDIRECT [[share-alike]]
 
This term is '''''not well defined'''' and should be avoided.  [[Microsoft]] widely uses the term '''viral''' to portray both free software and consortia as being like [[computer virus]] creators, exploiting the confusion.
 
The term is also sometimes used to imply [[required reintegration]], which is the controversial requirement that [[open source]] objects to in both free software and [[Consortium license]] software.  When this is what is being discussed, it is far better to use this more specific term and not "'''viral'''".
 
Some think they are two separate concerns, but they aren't:  [[required reintegration]] *is* a part of making a license viral - without it, new software under new licenses can be produced, thus making the original license not apply, and thus not viral, or "as" viral, as the original.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.