|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Wiki Management''' may require [[Wiki Editor]] and [[Wiki Lawyer]] to guide [[Wiki Sysop]] behaviour. Left on their own they tend to be [[little tin god]]s - each hoping to grow up to be [[GodKing]]. This shouldn't be encouraged.
| | #REDIRECT [[wiki management]] |
| | |
| Good sysops are disposable, period. Good editors are not. And good lawyers can keep your project going when it otherwise would be flushed down the toilet.
| |
| | |
| Wiki management problems include:
| |
| | |
| *knowing when [[written consensus]] is possible, e.g. using [[troll bridge]] approach, and when it's just going to continue as [[edit war]] forever no matter what, i.e. it is a [[Consumerium:political dispute]] or something that reflects a real world POV difference.
| |
| | |
| *knowing when [[soft security]] can't apply, e.g. definition of [[Consumerium:vandalism]].
| |
| | |
| *balancing [[Consumerium:contributor]] vs. [[Consumerium:editor]] balances of power.
| |
| | |
| *picking [[wiki software]] that actually makes it easy to do the above.
| |