Threats: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]]. | If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]]. | ||
The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, making [[use case]] analysis more efficient and guiding the writing of new [[Consumerium:User Stories|stories]], while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. | The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, making [[use case]] analysis more efficient and guiding the writing of new [[Consumerium:User Stories|stories]], while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. It lets you list [[bad thing]]s without getting into a lot of rhetoric about it. | ||
It also reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I *do* believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not. Persistent differences in this might make it obvious where [[faction]]s are. | |||
Here are some threats: | Here are some threats: | ||